Deacon Simon Writes: 19th May 2024
Which is more important language or message? If we want to communicate with someone is the language we use more or less important than the message we want to share?
In our first reading, the apostles were able to speak to people in their own tongue and communicate the message of eternal life through salvation gained for us by Jesus on the cross. But which is the bigger miracle – that the apostles could speak in foreign languages or that those who heard the message understood and were converted?
It is a silly question since both miracles were needed. If the apostles could not speak to the visitors to Jerusalem in their own language, then they would not have understood what the apostles were saying and if the message communicated was not clear, authentic, and true then the visitors would not have believed it.
Our Church has been speaking for several years now about the New Evangelism and the need for every Catholic to be involved in at least one of three principal settings:
1) Ordinary pastoral ministry (to inflame the hearts of the faithful);
2) Outreach to "the baptised whose lives do not reflect the demands of Baptism"; and
3) Evangelisation to those who do not know Jesus Christ or who have always rejected him.
Who, and in which setting, are you going to evangelise this week?
God bless you.
Deacon Simon








